![]() Since that time, with one exception, they have turned their attention to mixing tools – bread-and-butter applications like EQ, compression, etc. But can something that old still be called a “goodie”? Spoiler alert: it certainly can.įabFilter began its life offering an early synth and two significant creative FX modules (Volcano, a filter effect, was the other one besides Timeless). An enhanced version, Timeless 2, followed three years later. ![]() One of those was a delay called Timeless which was released around 2006. Its earliest products included a synth and several creative effects. Since that time it has earned a reputation as one of the top plug-in developers for sound quality, deep functionality and top-notch user interface design. I feel better staying away from IKM products, it is better to invest in FabFilter products if you expect long term maintenance.Can a delay plug-in first introduced well over a decade ago still compete with far newer ones? If yes, it could legitimately be called “timeless”.įabFilter released its first product in 2002. 1/2 and 1/32 at the same said:įYI, the MixBox app has some very useful said:įYI, the MixBox app has some very useful delays. Don't think I've quite got this down if the L and R relays are very different though i.e. not dotted\triplet) which is as close as possible to both desired L and R delays, and then use the L and R offsets to introduce the D and T elements when needed. And my fingers are on the chunky side which doesn't help.Īs for setting delays, one way I've tried to simplify the calculation is to set the Base Delay to the straight beat (i.e. Because of this it's the only plugin where I find myself reaching for the Apple Pencil sometimes for more accurate clicking. Mostly that works OK, with the double tap method etc (replacing modifier keys on desktop) but where controls are closely packed it can be a hassle as you say. My sense is that they've decided to keep the desktop interface and adapt it for iOS as much as possible. And it still looks pretty despite the huge clump of tiny toggles around the center delay button. But I can’t dock them too much because it’s still the best and my go-to delay for simple or complex. And it still looks pretty despite the huge clump of tiny toggles around the center delay said:Īll said, things got a little clunky with this new version, especially compared to the effortless re-design of Saturn 2. This is I guess a fatal flaw of the iPad and touch instead of a mouse, it really hampers things like this.Īll said, things got a little clunky with this new version, especially compared to the effortless re-design of Saturn 2. And my (non-fat) fingers on a 12.9” have trouble when I’m needing to double tap, pan, or create or adjust just one of the filters (and why not document how to do this stuff in the manual). ![]() The taps window is cute, and a fun feature with long delays, but the filter section is the crucial part. ![]() You could always tell Fabfilter pushes this air of superiority through their marketing, but they’ve never let it harm their design until now.Īlso, after a week with it, I stand by my original statement. Agreed with you on the design choice it feels snobby. The interface when you are turning the knob will note (dotted) or (triplet) when you get in the vicinity, but it still doesn’t make sense if you’re already working with a dotted or triplet base delay. I had to grab my phone and use a calculator. finding the Timeless 3 way of setting delay times quite unintuitive so far. I can't find a way to simply set L delay to 1/8 and R delay to 1/2. Loving Timeless 3 overall, but I'm missing the simplicity of being able to dial in L and R delay synced times in a much more simple way. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |